In the old days, it had a layout reminiscent that of Windows, having a single launcher that contained all the applications and settings. GNOME 3 introduced the GNOME shell which removed the launcher, menu, and icons on the desktop and brought about an interface that hides all your applications and only makes them appear when they are needed, keeping the desktop clutter-free.
KDE focuses more on the aesthetic side of things, having a slight resemblance to that of Windows. As mentioned above, KDE has an extremely beautiful design layout, vibrant wallpapers, and sharp and crisp icons. It also offers an aesthetically pleasing UI experience and several high-quality themes that are quite attractive.
In KDE, you access most of the stuff from the launcher including your applications which have been divided into different categories. This can be seen in the following image:. GNOME, on the other hand, has changed its appearance from its former self and now offers a more aubergine touch which gives a very modern vibe. GNOME vs. Comparison chart Differences — Similarities —.
Development Priorities Composed entirely of free and open-source software, GNOME focused from its inception on freedom, accessibility, internationalization and localization, developer friendliness, organization, and support. Follow Share Cite Authors.
Related Comparisons. Contribute to Diffen Edit or create new comparisons in your area of expertise. Log in ». Terms of use Privacy policy. A top-to-bottom free desktop environment designed for simplicity, accessibility, and ease of internationalization and localization.
A one-stop, integrated desktop environment; carrying out day-to-day tasks without reliance on command-line interface. This comparative section of this article is where most users will decide which of these two Linux-based desktop environments they will switch to or retain their usage. An observation on the usage of the GNOME and KDE desktop environments regarding their respective user communities continues to attract different desktop environment user types.
The early launch of these two desktop environments had KDE on the leaderboard with a continuously growing user community support. Ubuntu was yet to be crowned its deserved limelight during its early development stages as the most popularly used Linux OS distro.
It is now understandable why KDE became the go-to primary desktop environment option for the growing number of newbie users that found it user-friendly enough. Most of the current newbies that want to engage and familiarize themselves with the world of Linux operating systems find the GNOME desktop environment as an ideal preference over KDE. It is also responsible for a growing number of desktop environment support.
Ubuntu has great community support that caters to both newbies and experienced users. A new OS user is most likely to go after an operating system with a traditional appeal other than the one that poses modern tweaks on its desktop environment.
As such, a traditional desktop environment is easily adaptable. Also, the Linux universe is primarily themed as free and open-source. This attribute applies to most Linux distributions and flavors. Because of the free and open-source Linux status, the users centered to other Linux distros or flavors that want to give the KDE desktop environment a try have the option of installing it on their machine. Here are some supportive reasons why the KDE desktop environment will blend well with other Linux distros and flavor users.
To make this choice, you will have to make a performance decision regarding which of these two Linux desktop environments you think is best applicable to your Linux usage circumstances. The key points to note include the simplicity and ease of use of either of these desktop environments.
Some users find certain environments complex, while others will find them easily adaptable. This decision cannot be review-based. Another key point is the control the desktop environment feeds you as its user. Are you controlling the desktop environment, or is the desktop environment controlling your user experience? You should take minimal steps to reach your user-stored data. Launching apps or switching to an open window is as simple as pressing the Super key, typing the first few letters of the app's name, and hitting Enter.
The Activities Overview zooms in and out of focus, and it's something you're likely to interact with often. This motion can be physically straining for some people, who may find the relatively static nature of the Plasma desktop easier to handle for this reason. KDE menus not only display a vast assortment of features but the way it displays the settings is less consistent.
Some apps have a menu bar, some have a hamburger menu button, and some have neither. Both desktop environments feel fast on modern hardware. While KDE and GNOME both have their own pros and cons when it comes to the user interface, at the end of the day, one option uses fewer system resources than the other. That's KDE Plasma. KDE Plasma has even managed to undercut some traditional lightweight desktop environments like Xfce.
While both these desktop environments provide numerous features to their users, an experienced Linux user would have definitely switched back and forth a few times between KDE and GNOME.
You can really create some efficient workflows by tailoring Plasma to fit your precise use cases and preferences. You may also make better use of your system resources.
Whichever one you choose, you have access to some of the best software the Linux world has to offer. Whether you're new to Linux or you're a seasoned user, here are the best Linux software and apps you should be using today.
He delights in helping others decide which tech to bring into their lives The User Interface. The Best Linux Software and Apps Whether you're new to Linux or you're a seasoned user, here are the best Linux software and apps you should be using today.
0コメント